Cultural Appropriation for Me, Not for Thee

3 responses to “Cultural Appropriation for Me, Not for Thee”

1. 

   Hindu Bodhcong (@BodhcongSwadhan)

   2 July 18

   Well. There’all the Big City Peabrain Northern Fruitcakes Jigolos Revolutionaries White JungleBunnies Witches BellyButtons Dowon On Them All Goog Ice Hockey Players Just Tryin to Earn a Livin > bein all Perps bein All the Mutton Heads Politicians City Racials that Cut Down All the Trees As the Friggin Itch Scratch of the IGLOO’S Eskimos That Went Down Into the Desert and Sojourned There and They Hated It There Too.

   LikeLike

   Reply
2. 

   Hindu Bodhcong (@BodhcongSwadhan)

   22 September 18

   My real question is: At Statistics, can there exist a Concept of Statistics > which is Void of Probability? Can a Statistics exist which contains not Probabilistic functions. A “Function”, possibly actually “relates” 2 Separate Functions. All meaning is made by the relationship between 2 facts. {Feature the basic “Equation”}.
   Both the Indo-Asian “Nirukta” Linguistics, and the Aristotelian fact-based Linguistics; being those explicit Analytical Operations which effectively Precede both Etymology and Language but include Etymology (syllabic and micro-syllabic) and its’ subsequent development of Language: are dedicated originated individuated Analytical Operations. Prime Identifier and Sub-Identifiers; Parts, Sorts, Stages; Classification Trees: What real actual need would those, or any existent, Analytical Operations have for any such thing as a Probability? “If there were to be the assertion of Coexistence in Discreteness; is it the case, that the specific active indistinct, disorder, skattering action; and the skatterer making that skattering; are completely separated; as a result of which their Co-existence would be erroneously established as an Illusion? They fancy Co-existence, assuming in Illusion that the Discrete has been or ever could be established. They then again look for the Discrete for the erroneous purpose to establish the Illusion of Coexistence. That does not exist. That stares at an UnReal Existent in any human action.”. At the actual Lexicon of “Science”, Probability is defined by its’ own as an “unreal entity”. Does that fact make it “conceptual but not real, specifically because all prior and present Measurement is ineffectual or inadequate” ? HinduBodhcongPala@Gmail.com. And at Google+.
   Sorry about no paragraphs here. You cautioned me about that on your site about 12 years ago.
   Actually there exists an objectified science which explicitly rejects Einstein “Curved Space”; and states that > “Infinite Flat Space exists being the physical Cosmos observed in front of your eyes beyond that tree over there; materializing the only knowable existent Infinite. There also, cannot be found an Infinitely extensive Evil.”. That specific objectified Hypothesis; Non-Relativistic and Non-Probability: then must assert that Gravity and Electricity are 100% identical, and not differentiated in any substance from each other; even if Lifted Up, Dropped, and Conducted.

   LikeLike

   Reply
3. 

   Hindu Bodhcong (@BodhcongSwadhan)

   23 September 18

   If the question is that the person needs to be true and accurate intellect, conclusion-making, at anything of action; then it’s obvious that each real Hypothesis at study must be really internally diversified. Otherwise the student is not actually outside of the object of study, being not objective. Admitting fact that there are as many Crooks in Science and Statistics as there are in anything else does not have to take the fun out of it; because if you get bucked off that Buckin Bull Athlete Individuated Personality, that could be a Sign of Weakness, which would become “Academically Symbolic”. I wonder how many readers know the substantiated fact, beyond all assumed Socratic dispute, that Henri Poincare’ solely and first originated the famous Equation: E Equals MC Squared; making its’ only actual meaning of fact and structure. Einstein did not devise that Equation. Poincare’ worked for the France Mines Authority, had 800 ft of Rock or granulated above his head; which makes me doubt that “Relativity”, and “Probability”, are in that specific Equation at all.

   LikeLike

   Reply