Since Mexifornia appeared, the
debate also no longer splits along liberal/conservative,
Republican/Democrat, or even white/brown fault lines. Instead, class
considerations more often divide Americans on the issue. The majority
of middle-class and poor whites, Asians, African-Americans, and
Hispanics wish to close the borders. They see few advantages to cheap
service labor, since they are not so likely to need it to mow their
lawns, watch their kids, or clean their houses. Because the less
well-off eat out less often, use hotels infrequently, and don’t
periodically remodel their homes, the advantages to the economy of
inexpensive, off-the-books illegal-alien labor again are not so
apparent.
But the downside surely is apparent. Truck drivers, carpenters,
janitors, and gardeners—
unlike lawyers, doctors, actors, writers, and professors—correctly feel
that their jobs are threatened, or at least their wages lowered, by
cheaper rival workers from Oaxaca or Jalisco. And Americans who live in
communities where thousands of illegal aliens have arrived en masse
more likely lack the money to move when Spanish-speaking students flood
the schools and gangs proliferate. Poorer Americans of all ethnic
backgrounds take for granted that poverty provides no exemption from
mastering English, so they wonder why the same is not true for incoming
Mexican nationals.
….
These class divisions cut both ways, and they help explain the anomaly of the Wall Street Journalop-ed page mandarins echoing the arguments of the elite Chicano studies
professors. Both tend to ridicule the far less affluent Minutemen and
English-only activists, in part because they do not experience
firsthand the problems associated with illegal immigration but instead
find millions of aliens grist for their own contrasting agendas.
Indeed, every time an alien crosses the border legally, fluent in
English and with a high school diploma, the La Raza industry and the
corporate farm or construction company alike most likely lose a
constituent.
I’m beginning to get really tired of the rich. And the technical elite need to get a clue, too. At least one technology-intensive employer here in San Antonio preferentially hires H-1B-visa Chinese technoids to replace American labor. It seems management prefers workers who keep their heads down and code (or get deported) over people who keep having ideas.
Update (30 April). Over at the Gates of Vienna, Fjordman has an even gloomier outlook:
Left-wingers support this for the same reasons as left-wingers in
Europe: They desire Third World immigrants because they tend to vote
for left-wing parties and support expanded welfare states. Some
left-wingers also see it as a goal to erase the Western cultural
heritage and the white majority, again, just like in Europe. Some Big
Business supporters tend to see immigrants as cheap labor and a new
servant class. Of course, unlike some other countries, they get
citizenship in the US, which means that the “servants” will eventually
end up owning the country.
Leave a reply to Unknown Cancel reply