scientism
-
OK, I’m done talking about AGW
Dr Richard Lindzen cooks the goose of the Climate Changers: Inevitably in climate science, when data conflicts with models, a small coterie of scientists can be counted upon to modify the data. Thus, Santer, et al (2008), argue that stretching uncertainties in observations and models might marginally eliminate the inconsistency. That the data should always Read more
-
I see the Greenies have found God…
…and apparently His plan is to make the ANWR into a national monument More than 80 members of Congress, 170 scientists, some 300 businesses and organizations and 22 religious organizations have signed letters to the president. “Protecting the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is a moral issue. As people of faith, we not only have a Read more
-
Problems in evidence-based medicine
Ponder this the next time someone in the reality-based community tells you the “science is settled” based on peer-reviewed studies. Tip from the Instapundit. Read more
-
-
Sentence first — verdict afterwards
Uh oh, I think they’re on to us. Tip from Will Briggs. Title from this. Update (15 October). Kaiser Fung reminds us twice about story time. Tip from Andrew Gelman. Read more
-
“The science is settled.”
Looks like the California Air Resources Board (love the acronym!) put their thumb on the scale when they calculated diesel emission pollution. In my stats classes, this gets marked as wrong answer. Remember this the next time someone tells you “the science is settled.” Read more
The Random Texan 