Terrorizing ourselves

by

in

,

“The disappearance of a sense of responsibility is the most far-reaching consequence of submission to authority.”  Read Lynne Kiesling’s take on the legacy of 9/11:  “Be indomitable. Refuse to be terrorized.”

Update (10 September).  Richard Fernandez thinks we should go on the offense: “We have no right to forgive. We have no right to forget.”  Michelle Malkin spells it out for the more obtuse.

Mark Steyn isn’t amused, either:

One reason why there’s so little room at Ground Zero is because it’s still a building site. As I write in my new book, 9/11 was something America’s enemies did to us; the ten-year hole is something we did to ourselves — and in its way, the interminable bureaucratic sloth is surely as eloquent as anything Nanny Bloomberg will say in his remarks.


One response to “Terrorizing ourselves”

  1. vectormune Avatar

    Yes, personally I lost depreciating two disgusting 87-story office buildings full of Insurance people, 3 floors of awesome public spaces that made NYC look and feel pretty without fancy photo work, five planes, faith in most $500 suits’ flight capabilities, faith in 4 badasses per arbitrary commercial passenger flight, the whole Pentagon, and initiative launching heavy, rangey RPGs at jet elevators in midtown. I really need to work on that.

    Lynne Kiesling’s article reads in part: Refuse to be dominated, refuse to dominate. Be Indomitable. (There’s Criticism about TSA cruft, and legislation which passes for being terrorized, which Michelle Malkin and co. on their blog throw a big ball of FAIL at.) For my own flamebait, I’ll say that everyone who’s second-guessing the (e.g.) USA’s decisions to have a secular state deserves the strife. They’re a package. Pretend we’re people instead of Each Others’ Leviticus for a moment.

    Like

Leave a comment